Republican secretary of state candidate Matt Schultz launched a second television commercial CORRECTION: web ad called “Not the Chicago Way”:
Transcript by me:
I’m Matt Schultz, and I’m running for Iowa secretary of state because I’m worried about the future of my children and the future of your children and grandchildren. It’s time for new leadership in Des Moines, and I’m prepared to stand up and fight for fair and honest elections. Vote early, vote often might be the Chicago way, but it’s not the Iowa way. I’m Matt Schultz, and I approved this message because I’m a conservative Republican fighting to protect the most important right of all: your right to vote.
Like Schultz’s first ad, this commercial raises the specter of voter fraud without any evidence that this has been a problem in Iowa.
When Schultz says, “Vote early, vote often might be the Chicago way,” the visual is a smiling Barack Obama in front of Obama/Biden campaign signs. The hint is sure to play well with Republican primary voters, many of whom may believe the 2008 election was stolen. That’s easier to accept than the reality of a Democratic presidential candidate clobbering the Republican.
Journalists should ask Schultz if he really believes (as this commercial implies) that Barack Obama got where he is because of Chicago-style election fraud. Then they should ask him to prove that “vote early, vote often” has happened even once in Iowa during the past decade or two.
When Schultz says “I’m Matt Schultz, and I approved this message,” the visual shows the words, “TRUST BUT VERIFY.” Schultz used the same Ronald Reagan catch phrase in his first ad, although the Republican icon’s famous words have nothing to do with voter fraud.
Your unintentional comedy of the day comes from Polk County Republican Party chairman Ted Sporer’s blog, commenting on Schultz’s commercial:
The only reason to oppose photo ID for voting is to perpetuate fraud. No other good faith explanation is possible. Although we are lucky to have the rarest of animals, an honest and competent Democrat, serving as Iowa’s SoS, Mike Mauro’s Democrat colleagues are your more garden variety and ethically challenged L/S/Ds.
As I discussed here, photo ID laws threaten to disenfranchise large numbers of voters (the 12 percent of the population lacking a photo ID) in order to solve a virtually non-existent problem (impersonating another voter at a polling place). That’s why advocacy groups who work to protect “the most important right of all, your right to vote” almost universally oppose photo ID laws.
In case you were wondering, L/S/Ds means “Labor/Socialist/Democrats” in “the real Sporer” lingo.
Schultz may pander his way to his party’s nomination, but his rhetoric ignores a fact that even Sporer grudgingly acknowledges: Secretary of State Mike Mauro is honest and highly competent. No one active in politics today has done more to safeguard fair and honest elections in Iowa than Mauro.
4 Comments
I Think I Presented A Very Good Explanation
on the campaign website of why I believe voter photo ID laws are not a good idea for Iowa.
jakeporter Mon 7 Jun 4:36 PM
I didn't see that
do you have a link? I will add it to the post.
desmoinesdem Mon 7 Jun 7:36 PM
No need to link to the campaign website
I just could not believe someone would suggest that the “only reason to oppose photo ID for voting is to perpetuate fraud” and as a candidate who will likely be on the ballot in the general election as a Libertarian I felt it was necessary to add a section to my issues page explaining my position on the issue of photo id since I receive many questions about it.
I was not trying to hijack the thread, just to show that people can have reasonable disagreements on an issue without it being some attempt to commit fraud.
jakeporter Mon 7 Jun 8:41 PM
not hijacking at all
I am happy to link to a conservative case against photo ID requirements.
desmoinesdem Mon 7 Jun 9:54 PM