What’s on your mind this weekend, Bleeding Heartland readers? This is an open thread: all topics welcome.
A few days ago, the Romenesko blog delivered a depressing inside view of life for Des Moines Register reporters. I encourage you to click through and read the whole memo on “Minimal job requirements of a self-directed reporter.” Bleeding Heartland has long lamented the relentless series of cuts to the Register’s news division through buyouts and layoffs. The flip side to that story is the growing list of jobs journalists are expected to do now. Judging by this memo, Gannett expects news staff not only to report well-researched “watchdog” pieces and breaking news, but also to edit their own work, closely monitor how stories are performing on the website (changing headlines if necessary), and do marketing and branding tasks that I wouldn’t consider a reporter’s job. On top of all that, the bosses expect journalists to have time to engage with readers on various social media, promote their colleagues’ stories as well as their own, and set up “get-to-know-you coffee meetings” with “key people on your beat.” Who has time for all this?
But wait! I buried the lede. The bombshell comes in the first passage under the first subheading (GROW YOUR AUDIENCE):
Define your audience: Work with your coach or strategist to define in detail the audience you are trying to reach for specific pieces of content. Also keep in mind our overall focus on the 25-45 age demographic.
Keep in mind the interests of your core audience as you decide what stories to write.
I will shortly exit the Register’s desired age cohort, joining what must be a very large share of the newspaper’s subscribers.
Presumably the “focus on the 25-45 age demographic” is why the Register’s “coaches” and “strategists” don’t mind when reporters waste time on stories such as what Mila Kunis said on Reddit about Casey’s breakfast pizza. Though in fairness, that “news” brings a collateral benefit: free publicity for a retail chain that’s a potential major advertiser in Iowa newspapers.
The Register’s memo expanded my vocabulary with one new word: “listicle,” suggested as a way for a self-directed reporter to “feed your audience’s interest” in a hot topic. “Listicle” refers to “a short-form of writing that uses a list as its thematic structure, but is fleshed out with sufficient copy to be published as an article.” Like many bloggers, I enjoy writing that kind of post (Three silver linings from Iowa’s 2014 elections, 15 Iowa politics predictions for 2015, Five political realities that should worry Democrats, Three political realities that should worry Republicans). I just didn’t know the format had a special name.
Speaking of engaging with your readers, I have a request for Bleeding Heartland’s core audience of anyone interested in Iowa politics. As the Iowa caucus campaign heats up, please keep your eyes and ears open for telephone surveys, push-polls, or direct mail promoting or attacking any specific candidate. Feel free to post a guest diary containing notes on the poll or screen-shots of the direct mail, or send me a private and confidential heads up by e-mail. This also means you, Republicans in the Bleeding Heartland community: I know you’re out there, and I appreciate your taking the time to read a left-leaning website. With a more lively competition on the GOP side, Iowa’s registered Republicans are more likely to receive newsworthy message-testing calls or hit pieces as the year goes on.
3 Comments
Polling
I saw this poll mentioned at the Daily Kos this morning and followed the link to Politico. Was wondering if this was the poll that we were talking about the other day where Dems were targeted.
“The poll was conducted on January 20 and 21, and collected 80 percent of its responses by phone and 20 percent online.”
http://www.politico.com/story/…
abgdinstr Sun 8 Feb 9:39 PM
different poll
From the article you linked:
They are talking about a national poll done in January by PPP (which uses robocalling). The poll we were talking about was conducted by a different polling firm last week using live interviewers, and it didn’t ask respondents any questions about whether they would support Clinton over Republican candidates.
As much as I admire Senator Warren, it is pretty delusional to suggest that she is more electable than Hillary Clinton. You’re talking about a Harvard professor from Massachusetts who’s not even halfway through her first term in the Senate versus someone who was first lady for eight years, senator for six years, and secretary of state for four years.
desmoinesdem Mon 9 Feb 6:43 AM
Experience
The name Jimmy Carter comes to mind. Governor of Georgia is not really preparation to be POTUS, but he was. HRC is very experienced with the federal government, granted. She is also loved by Wall Street that will not resonate with a lot of us snuffys. That said, I agree with you that she will not run even if drafted.
abgdinstr Mon 9 Feb 7:21 PM