Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina Call on
Democratic Presidential Candidates to Sign Campaign Pledge
Des Moines, Las Vegas, Concord, Columbia – The Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina Democratic Parties joined together today in releasing a pledge that calls on the Presidential candidates to preserve the traditional role of retail politics, socioeconomic and ethnic diversity early in the nominating process.
The pledge, a one-page document that the early states are asking the Presidential candidates to sign, respects the work done by the DNC’s Rules and Bylaws Committee in 2006. The Committee created a pre-window allowing for early contests in only Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina. This calendar was approved by the full DNC over a year ago.
As Chairs of the four pre-window Democratic State parties, we believe recent actions by a few states have sought to create upheaval in the approved calendar and dismantle the thoughtful and deliberate work previously agreed upon. As a party, we owe it to the people working diligently to elect the next Democratic President of the United States to conduct a sensible and timely nominating process, one that has already been established.
“I believe the pledge we asked the Presidential candidates to sign sends a strong message from Iowa and our early-state companions that the pre-window must be respected,” said Scott Brennan, Iowa Democratic Party State Chair. “We need to bring order, predictability and common sense to the presidential nominating calendar and focus on electing a President who will deal with the ongoing war in Iraq, healthcare and renewable energy, instead of focusing on selecting dates to hold our nominating contests.”
Attached to this release is the letter sent to all the Democratic Presidential candidates along with the pledge the Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina Democratic Parties are asking the candidates to sign.
Dear Democratic Presidential Candidate:
Throughout 2005 and 2006, the Democratic National Committee worked diligently to establish a presidential nominating calendar that would ensure victory for the 2008 Democratic Presidential Nominee, preserve the traditional role of retail politics early in the nominating process and to include the socioeconomic and ethnic diversity that makes this Party great.
In 2006, through a fair and open process conducted by the DNC’s Rules and Bylaws Committee, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina were selected for the “pre-window.” The calendar was approved by the full DNC over a year ago. We are in agreement that the states chosen by our party reflect the energy and diversity of our great country and our party.
Recent actions by a few states could dismantle this thoughtful and deliberate effort by the DNC. Presidential campaigns, county chairs, elected officials, activists and the media have reached out and asked for our help in bringing this uncertainty (and potential chaos) to an end. Campaigns need to make major spending decisions. County Chairs need to find precinct locations and precinct chairs. Elected officials need to finalize election logistics. As a party we owe it to these organizations and individuals to conduct a sensible and timely nominating process.
For the good of our party and our candidates, it is our desire to bring finality, predictability and common sense to the nominating calendar. We ask you to accept the attached four state pledge, steeped in established DNC rules, by signing and sending the pledge form by Thursday, September 6, 2007, via email to South Carolina Chairwoman Carol Fowler at [email redacted]. Please also mail a hard copy to Chairwoman Fowler at SCDP, [address redacted].
We appreciate your consideration of this pledge which brings order to the presidential nominating calendar. We look forward to focusing on electing a President, rather than selecting dates. If you or your staff has any questions, please contact any of the four State Party Chairs or Executive Directors.
Thank you,
Senator Tom Harkin Governor Chet Culver Chair Scott Brennan, Iowa Dem. Party
Senator Harry Reid Chair Jill Derby, Nevada State Democratic Party
Chair Ray Buckley, New Hampshire Dem. Party
Congressman Jim Clyburn Chair Carol Fowler, South Carolina Dem. Party
Four State Pledge Letter 2008
Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, South Carolina
August 31, 2007
WHEREAS, Over a year ago, the Democratic National Committee established a 2008 nominating calendar;
WHEREAS, this calendar honors the racial, ethnic, economic and geographic diversity of our party and our country;
WHEREAS, the DNC also honored the traditional role of retail politics early in the nominating process, to insure that money alone will not determine our presidential nominee;
WHEREAS, it is the desire of Presidential campaigns, the DNC, the states and the American people to bring finality, predictability and common sense to the nominating calendar.
THEREFORE, I _______________, Democratic Candidate for President, pledge I shall not campaign or participate in any state which schedules a presidential election primary or caucus before Feb. 5, 2008, except for the states of Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina, as “campaigning” is defined by rules and regulations of the DNC.
___________________________ __________
John/Jane Doe, Doe for President DATE
11 Comments
Fl , MI
Any downfall for not making a pledge to only campaign in the early states?
maria25rodriguez Fri 31 Aug 5:00 PM
makes no difference
Hillary will win FL whether other people campaign there or not.
Media will cover FL primary whether DNC awards Hillary delegates or not.
I don’t think Iowa is ever going to get to go first again. We better savor these next few months.
desmoinesdem Fri 31 Aug 7:05 PM
Completely Disagree
Yes Hillary will win Florida, but no the media will not cover it like it matters. If every campaign chooses not to campaign there it will be like the January 13, 2004 Washington DC caucus – meaningless.
simon-stevenson Sun 2 Sep 3:34 PM
If she campaigns alone
If only Clinton does not sign the pledge, then she would be the only one campaigning in Florida, and perhaps Michigan. Obama, Edwards, Richardson, Biden and Dodd have already signed.
I am not sure that uncontested Florida and Michigan would be much of a story for the press, especially if the DNC follows through and does not allow the Florida and Michigan delegates to be seated at the convention.
If Clinton does not sign the pledge, or if she waits too long to sign it, she is going to drop in the Iowa polls like a stone. Dissing the Iowa caucuses (as played relentlessly by WHO TV) was one of Dean’s downfalls.
Will Clinton give up her investment in Iowa? She has spent a lot of time and money here, and what would her staff and supporters think?
My guess is that Clinton signs the pledge and that Florida and Michigan change their minds.
tom Sat 1 Sep 4:01 PM
Clinton signed the pledge
at least that’s what I read on the other blogs.
But it makes no difference. She will win Florida even if she doesn’t campaign there, and the media will cover that even if the DNC awards FL no delegates.
Iowa is going to be less important this cycle, I’m afraid.
desmoinesdem Sat 1 Sep 9:14 PM
Iowa
Anyone knows whether DMR will release an Iowa poll this month?
The good news for Obama is that he seems to be slowly trending up in IA.
Even ARG shows a nice trend for him while Edwards and Hillary trends down.
maria25rodriguez Sat 1 Sep 11:41 PM
I think DMR will have a new poll in Sep
The last few polls have shown an upward trend for Obama since he launched his tv ads.
I don’t know when Edwards is going up on the air here. I think he has held on to most of his support even as the other candidates have been advertising on tv while he has stayed dark in Iowa.
desmoinesdem Sun 2 Sep 9:30 AM
Obama-Edwards
The ‘what If’ Obama ad is very powerful so i’m not surprised it created a bit of an uptick movement.
Is this ad still running in Iowa? I would think that they would keep on running it for one more week entering labor day which is the official kick off day as more people starts tuning in.
Someone on the blogs suggested that Tom Harkin may endorse Obama.Have you heard anything or rumors about that?
Obama will need a major endorser to counter Bill Clinton popularity inside democratic circles.
Al Gore , Tom Harkin , Ted Kennedy , Bill Bradley.I would love an Al Gore endorsement for christmas.
maria25rodriguez Sun 2 Sep 10:07 AM
I haven't heard
but I don’t think Harkin will endorse Obama or anyone else. For one thing, his wife is for Hillary.
For another, his endorsement didn’t stop Dean’s slide.
Plus, Harkin got a lot of Democrats really mad at him when he endorsed Dean. I think he will do the smart thing and stay out of this.
desmoinesdem Mon 3 Sep 12:25 AM
Harkin
To be fair here , if Howard Dean had never gotten so over excited and ‘screamed’ , he would have won. The scream accelerated his downfall and there was nothing an Harkin or Gore endorsement could have done to stop this speeding 18 wheeler from hitting Dean in the face.
I’m told Harkin is heavily advising Obama on rural area behind the scene but maybe this doesn’t mean a thing.Maybe he’s also advising Hillary , Edwards and others as much.
I’m also told that Harkin thinks that if Obama can get his numbers up a bit in rural Iowa , he would cruise to an easy victory in the state.
maria25rodriguez Mon 3 Sep 3:15 AM
Told by who?
Dean didn’t scream until after he lost Iowa by 20 points. His reaction didn’t help, but even without it he would have been the underdog (and maybe without it the media would have paid more attention to John Edwards, pushing Dean even farther down.)
I’m guessing you’re being “told” this stuff by Obama supporters, because the advice Harkin is supposedly giving doesn’t even make any sense.
simon-stevenson Mon 3 Sep 7:56 PM