Obama in Quad Cities links and discussion thread

President Barack Obama visited the Alcoa Davenport Works on Tuesday to tout his economic policies. One of the largest employers in the Quad Cities area, the Alcoa plant “returned to its pre-recession employment numbers and is hiring more workers this summer,” thanks to a new supply agreement with the European firm Airbus. Obama said the economic crisis that began before he took office “demanded that we make some tough decisions — decisions that we now know have pulled our economy back from the brink and put us on a better path.” In particular, he mentioned federal aid for worker training and a federal program designed to connect engineering universities with manufacturers. The president also praised Alcoa managers for adapting to market conditions, changing an outmoded sheet metal product to a product now in high demand.

It’s fantastic that Alcoa Davenport Works is back to pre-recession employment, and the jobless rate in the Quad Cities is about 6.6 percent, well below the national average. But in most of the United States, unemployment and underemployment are still at historically high levels. The Department of Labor’s jobs report for May was “very disappointing,” prompting the Calculated Risk blog to note, “This is a better pace of payroll job creation than last year, but the economy still has 6.95 million fewer payroll jobs than at the beginning of the 2007 recession. At this pace (157 thousand jobs per month), it will take almost 4 years just to get back to the pre-recession level, or sometime in late 2014 or early 2015!”

I don’t see how photo ops will convince American voters that Obama has helped put the economy on the right track. When bringing down the unemployment rate should be the administration’s top priority, Obama has bought into austerity politics instead. Probably sometime within the next month, he will agree to another major drag on the economy (big federal spending cuts) as a price for getting Congress to raise the debt ceiling. Conservative commentator David Frum argued persuasively here that “Obama is his own worst enemy”:

With unemployment at 10% and interest rates at 1%, the president got persuaded that it was debt and interest that trumped growth and jobs as Public Issue #1.

[…] Back in 2008, Obama made two big promises: a tax cut for everybody earning less than $250,000 and an Afghan surge. […] In the very different circumstances of 2009, both promises rapidly showed themselves to be counter-productive. The “tax cut” promise caused Obama to direct almost one-third of his big stimulus into an individual tax rebate that no economist would have regarded as effective, for reasons explained by Milton Friedman more than 40 years ago. […] He proceeded with both, leading to the two biggest problems of his presidency: a stimulus that added hugely to the national debt while under-delivering on jobs and an expanded Afghanistan war that must end in a reversion to the same disappointing status quo that prevailed before the Afghan surge. Obama probably anticipated both results. And yet he staggered forward anyway. As ready as Obama is to surrender to uncongenial political pressures, he is strangely inattentive to negative real-world results.

Share any thoughts about Obama’s Iowa visit or economic policy in this thread. After the jump I’ve posted statements released by Democratic Representatives Bruce Braley and Dave Loebsack. The Quad Cities area has been part of the first Congressional district (Braley’s territory), but under Iowa’s new map Scott County will be in the second district, where Loebsack is running for re-election in 2012.

Dave Loebsack statement, June 28:

Washington, D.C. – Congressman Dave Loebsack today released the following statement after President Obama’s visit to Alcoa Davenport Works:

“I appreciate the President’s visit to Bettendorf to see firsthand the great work being done here.  The economic downturn has hurt far too many Iowa families for far too long, and we must come together to rebuild our economy and put Iowans back to work.   I applaud the President for his focus on workforce development and creating manufacturing jobs that will bring high quality, good paying jobs to Iowa.

“The work being done at Alcoa is a great example of what the President’s effort will do – bring together industry, universities and the federal government to invest in emerging technologies that create jobs and enhance competitiveness.

“I have worked to emphasize the need to manufacture more products in the United States and have introduced the SECTORS Act that would help retool and streamline our workforce development programs that are needed to train our workers for specialized fields by bringing together key players, just as the President’s initiative will.”

Earlier this year, Congressman Loebsack reintroduced the SECTORS Act.  This legislation provides grants that allow local partners to address the training needs of multiple employers and help educational institutions and other training providers align curricula and programs to meet industry demands in fields such as advanced manufacturing, energy or healthcare.  It also improves workers’ job quality while encouraging the creation, and obtaining of, nationally portable, industry-recognized credentials.

Loebsack has also cosponsored the Security in Energy And Manufacturing (SEAM) Act, H.R. 724, which provides Advanced Energy Manufacturing Tax Credits to companies.

Bruce Braley statement, June 28:

Washington, DC – Today, Congressman Bruce Braley (IA-01) released the following statement on President Obama’s visit to the Alcoa plant in his district in Bettendorf, IA:

“I’ve long called for a national manufacturing strategy so I’m very pleased that the President is turning his focus to the manufacturing crisis in this country.

“During the past decade, we’ve lost five million manufacturing jobs and 54,000 factories. All Americans should be troubled by this. Our economy, our national security and our nation’s future depend on a strong manufacturing sector that provides good-paying jobs to middle class Americans.

“The President’s leadership is crucial to help us restore the image of America as a country that builds things.”

About the Author(s)

desmoinesdem

  • A couple of thoughts

    The American people have bought into austerity politics.  If we had given Obama the votes in 2010 he could have let those tax cuts expire.

    In my view the American people voted for those tax cuts in 2010, Obama is doing his best to carry out the duties as a President in a representative democracy.  It also became clear to me that cabinet secretaries did not have a definite plan to cut down barriers and implement the stimulus.  

    • I do not agree

      that people voted for extending all the Bush tax cuts. I’ve seen numerous national opinion polls that show support for raising taxes on the wealthy. The 2010 electorate wasn’t representative of U.S. public opinion as a whole.

      The stimulus had a lot of good pieces, and it certainly created jobs–just not enough to make up for the massive drop in private sector demand. It should have been larger and more targeted toward policies that create jobs.

      • I understand what you are saying

        Politics is not an activity that you can take a cycle off of if you want a certain direction taken however  Polls are good for keeping people employed and good to chatter about, but electorally speaking they mean squat.  Polls are framed with an ideological bent most of the time, completely useless in many regards.  

        It doesn’t matter what polls say, a bunch of ultra conservative nuts now sit in the U.S. House.  People get what they vote for or apathetically sit out for.  Obama had no electoral capital if people 18-30 don’t vote or more importantly don’t follow the issues.  

        I agree with you that the stimulus should have been larger. Tax cuts do create jobs for companies who do decide to keep their companies here however.  I generally agree with you on the argument for demand.  

        • 19 opinion polls this year

          Economist Bruce Bartlett links to 19 opinion polls (all taken in 2011) showing that the majority of Americans support raising taxes in order to reduce the deficit.

          • Polls

            They are irrelevant in the big scheme of things.  People have to vote that way in the booth and not sit it out in protest either.  Polls are meant to make a certain ideology feel like they have control.  If you word something a certain way, you could get 90 percent of the American people against Medicare, polls mean nothing.  

            The voters I talk to act like tax increases are an anathema, yet they still vote for people who may raise their taxes.  People don’t know what they are voting for, this is the issue.    The Republicans didn’t pull much of a bait and switch either.

             They never said Planned Parenthood wouldn’t become an issue.  Nancy Pelosi keeps saying they haven’t produced a jobs bill, but according to their ideology they have with the deregulation push.  They aren’t going to increase funding for DOT or FAA projects which would certainly create jobs, that isn’t their style.  

Comments