Someone I know who spends a lot of time on blogs professionally told me that political blogs make up only about 5 percent of the blogosphere. I had no idea–until recently I never read any non-political blogs.
In the past few months I've started reading more blogs related to mothering, natural parenting and green or simple living. Most of these blogs are non-political, although some have the occasional pro-Republican post. Many of them have a Christian orientation as well.
I've learned a lot from reading these blogs. One surprising lesson I've learned is that people take offense much more easily on parenting blogs than at places like Daily Kos and MyDD. I have seen bloggers get quite offended by “total strangers” posting “rude” comments on their blogs that really didn't seem so rude to me.
They should see what some of the Clintonistas say about me at MyDD!
Some of the non-political bloggers I read take a much more active role in restricting the comments on their blogs.
When political bloggers do this (like iPol), it's to prevent spam from being posted, not a way to screen out opposing views. Cyclone Conservatives and The Real Sporer don't censor my comments.
I've had some of my comments screened out by non-political bloggers for reasons I don't understand. I make an effort to be respectful in my disagreement and truly don't think my censored comments were offensive. Half the time I was just trying to make things interesting on a thread containing 30-plus comments along the lines of “Excellent post! Thanks so much for putting that in perspective!”
Anyway, does anyone else out there read non-political blogs on sports or hobbies or whatever? If so, have you noticed less of a tolerance for spirited disagreement?
4 Comments
A Comment on Comments :-)
Other than spam (i.e., “click this link for the truth about Barak Obama!”), the only occasion upon which I will not post a comment submitted on iPol is when the comment is a personal attack against another person, like another reader or fellow blogger. This has happened only twice, I’m happy to say.
Beyond that, I’ve never screened out negative comments about myself or something I’ve posted – take a look at the comments related to my interview with Dennis Kucinich (http://ipol-2008.blo…) for a good, healthy sample of comments who (to put it mildly) disagreed with me.
Where I feel commentors have, in my opinion, missed the point, or simply gotten it wrong, I will respond with a counterpoint, but, again, that’s all done in the open, where readers can see the comments and judge for themselves.
I feel this approach strikes the best overall balance between preserving healthy debate and exchange of views, while keeping the troll factor to a minimum.
Disagree? Feel free to go over to my blog and…well… leave a comment!
~iPol
http://ipol-2008.blo…
iPol: the Personal Pronoun, as applied to politics.
ipol Sun 5 Aug 7:58 AM
A Comment on Comments :-)
Other than spam (i.e., “click this link for the truth about Barak Obama!”), the only occasion upon which I will not post a comment submitted on iPol is when the comment is a personal attack against another person, like another reader or fellow blogger. This has happened only twice, I’m happy to say.
Beyond that, I’ve never screened out negative comments about myself or something I’ve posted – take a look at the comments related to my interview with Dennis Kucinich (http://ipol-2008.blo…) for a good, healthy sample of comments who (to put it mildly) disagreed with me.
Where I feel commentors have, in my opinion, missed the point, or simply gotten it wrong, I will respond with a counterpoint, but, again, that’s all done in the open, where readers can see the comments and judge for themselves.
I feel this approach strikes the best overall balance between preserving healthy debate and exchange of views, while keeping the troll factor to a minimum.
Disagree? Feel free to go over to my blog and…well… leave a comment!
~iPol
http://ipol-2008.blo…
iPol: the Personal Pronoun, as applied to politics.
ipol Sun 5 Aug 10:57 AM
A couple of instances
I read some non-political blogs. A few related to the writer and director, Josh Whedon. Nobody posts anything negative. It’s all worshipful. Even when Josh does something controversial like speak out on women’s rights in the middle east.
I also read a “consumerist” blog. Here, the “disagreement” takes the form of right-wing/ pro-corporate/ free market advocates and defenders virulently attacking people who say most anything negative about the Wonderful Corporation of the Week, a profound general abuse of and contempt for people who shop at Walmart, people who may have been injured by unsafe products, anyone who ever sued any company, or anyone who advocates any kind of government regulation or intervention in the market. Essentially, the unrestricted posting has destroyed the blog as a discussion forum about useful consumer information. The articles are still occasionally useful, but I no longer even look at comments.
mwd Sun 5 Aug 3:23 PM
Wow, I had no idea...
that there were so few political blogs. I have NEVER read a non-political blog, so I can’t comment directly to your blog.
I am, however, very new to blogging–it has been about three months. Boy, was I naive. I remember my first Kos blog. I had never even read the Kos, I just kept hearing about it, so I went on there with wide-eyes and an open heart and posted a great, positive, hopeful, happy post about why I supported Senator Biden.
Yeah. That went over REAL WELL.
I went back later to read the comments and I was momentarily stunned. And then sad. And then angry. And then sad again. Then I gathered my wits and responded to many comments. And I ignored many too (the really belligerent ones).
The whole experience was relatively traumatic and kind of a blogging version of gang initiation (in my mind).
armywife Fri 17 Aug 6:07 AM