America has forgotten civility and compromise

Bruce Lear lives in Sioux City and has been connected to Iowa’s public schools for 38 years. He taught for eleven years and represented educators as an Iowa State Education Association regional director for 27 years until retiring. He can be reached at BruceLear2419@gmail.com   

Everyone watching TV has probably seen Mattress Firm’s ads with the tagline, “How do you sleep at night?” There’s quite a variety. There’s the muscle man at the gym drenching the weightlifting bench in sweat and then refusing to wipe it up. There’s Nana catfishing on a dating app using a fake bikini clad photo and then saying, “They even send me gift cards sometimes,” and there’s the barefoot guy feet up on the plane.

What do these ads illustrate? They all show a person behaving badly, and then bragging that they sleep well because of Mattress Firm.

My guess is ten years ago a national company wouldn’t design ads where the main character is someone you wouldn’t want to follow at the gym, get reeled in on a dating app, or be forced to sit by on a plane. 

What’s changed?

Some might see these ads as a rebellion against political correctness. But the common definition of political correctness is, “Conforming to a prevailing political view, to avoid using language insulting a group.” Political correctness has nothing to do with some guy on a plane deciding he should have the right to force other passengers to see and smell his bare feet.

It’s about basic civility and willingness to compromise for the comfort of others.

As families gather for the holidays, everyone craves harmony or at least compromise. But for many, once they catch up on family ailments, talk about the weather, and dote on the children, someone will say something vaguely political. Soon the red hats and those bleeding blue square off. The only hope is the turkey tryptophan will make the combatants drowsy.  

Like the TV ads, we seem to have forgotten how to be civil or to compromise.

It’s no wonder since during the past 24 months, we’ve heard insults as a campaign tactic for an ugly presidential race. Before you dismiss this as just another hard-fought campaign, imagine Richard Nixon calling John Kennedy “stupid, mentally unstable, and low IQ.” Imagine John Kennedy comparing Nixon to Hitler and calling him a danger to democracy. Even the president-elect’s Thanksgiving message is full of taunting insults. The 1960s public would have been repulsed. Like children, both sides blame the other for starting it.

We just shrug.

Yes, our Founding Fathers weren’t delicate combatants either. John Adams referred to Alexander Hamilton as “The bastard brat of a Scott peddler.” Adams also called George Washington “Illiterate, unlearned, and unread.” Jefferson called John Adams “distrustful, obstinate, and excessively vain.” The difference is there were no cable megaphones like CNN, Fox, MSNBC, and bro podcasts blasting political insults 24-7.  

Abraham Maslow said, “If the only tool you have is a hammer, you will start treating all your problems like a nail.” Quite a few politicians believe they must hammer opponents into submission instead of finding compromise. Both parties do it, because voters reward it. Being civil and compromising may not be exciting, but it solves real problems. 

Throwing insults kills compromise.

I bargained educator contracts for 30 years. I didn’t always get my way, and neither did the other side. Generally, we worked out compromises not because we wanted to, but because we had to for the best interest of the people we represented. If we didn’t, the arbitrator decided on a solution.

It’s hard to demonize the other side and then make a deal with the devil. Your own constituency won’t trust the bargain. Yes, there are principles that can’t be compromised, and they need to be clearly understood by both parties and civilly protected as sacred.

We need a return to civility and compromise. If we don’t, democracy could get hammered.


Top image is by fizkes, available via Shutterstock.

Tags: Commentary

About the Author(s)

Bruce Lear

  • Logical

    American fathers and mothers did not vote for those who closed schools for months, in the name of “science”. Never forget.

  • Protection

    They did vote for people who recognized the deadly threat of COVID and protected their children by closing schools. They used science and common sense to make that decision.

  • This from ABC News, Dec 5

    “US students’ declining math scores are ‘sobering,’ expert says
    Test results show students in the U.S. lag behind those in Asia and Europe.”

    U.S. schools closed for much longer than other civilized countries. And the poor kids had little to do with propagating Covid or suffering serious health consequences. Dems and teacher’s unions failed them, dumbing them down a generation of Americans for their lifetime. Never again.

  • "Dumbing down" the "poor kids" is happening, but not strictly due to a period of covid lockdown

    I’m sure that Karl M has a genuine concern about US students’ math scores. Yeah, right.

    Unfortunately, our students are not receiving the educations they deserve. Lack of proper funding, sharing public funding with private school vouchers, intimidating educators and revisionist history are reasons that come to mind.

    Keep them uninformed and maybe they will believe your lies and give you their votes when they are of age.

  • Comment

    On a continuum of causes and effects, I’m sure “Covid closures” is on the list of causes for fluctuations in standardized test schools, but not at the top. It tops the list of parent’s concerns, especially if they were missing work to care for their children. As Bruce suggests, the balls in the air were 1) a dangerous new virus that was killing thousands and overwhelming hospitals, 2) closures of places and business where people congregated, 3) initially, insufficient information or understanding of COVID, 4) the novelty and insufficient training of home learning and teaching, 4) the need for home learning results equivalent to in-school learning, 5) kids’ attitudes and behavior slumped and, on returning, brought these with them, 6) statewide baseless criticism of public schools, teachers, curriculum, and expectations

Comments