My dad was a Rockefeller Republican. He was disappointed by the turn the party took in the 1980s and 1990s, and though he died before George W. Bush was selected president, I've always felt that he would have definitively made the break from the GOP during this decade.
At the same time, I've felt that the number of disenchanted Rockefeller Republicans (liberal on social issues and supportive of things like progressive taxation and the estate tax) is not big enough to cost the GOP much in the electoral arena.
Tonight I ran into a former colleague of my father's, whom I hadn't seen in a long time. It was an eye-opening conversation to me; the circle of Republicans who are disgusted by their party's standard-bearers is broader than I had realized.
More after the jump.
My dad worked with this man for about 20 years, so they knew each other well. The former colleague (probably now in his late 50s or early 60s) is your classic old-fashioned Republican: country club, Chamber of Commerce, mainline Protestant, pro-choice, very successful in his profession. I know for sure that he has been active in the Iowa Republican Party in the past.
When I ran into him and his wife, we chatted for a few minutes about what I'm doing, their home remodel, etc. Then I asked him if he had a presidential candidate yet.
“I don't have a party,” he replied.
I mentioned that I'd watched a couple of the Republican presidential debates and wondered if my dad would even identify as a Republican today. He said with certainty, “He wouldn't.” He added that he doesn't plan to support any of the Republican presidential candidates, and a lot of Republicans he knows plan to sit out this next election.
“You have no idea how big your victory is going to be,” he said. The wife nodded. She is also disgusted by the current crop of candidates.
I mentioned having met a Republican who told me he would consider voting for Bill Richardson. The wife said she really likes him–he's solid, he's shown that he can get things done, and “I just love his ads. They are so upbeat.” I asked if they thought there would be a big crossover vote, and the wife certainly seemed open to the prospect. The husband said he suspected that the Republicans he knew wouldn't vote Democratic, but would sit out the general election.
He repeated that the Democrats are headed for a huge victory. “You're going to have the presidency, the House and the Senate.” The wife added, “And that's probably not a bad thing.”
I was simply stunned to hear these comments. This guy is very plugged into business Republican circles. This isn't your Limbaugh/Hannity listening crowd, but this is an important part of the GOP's coalition (especially on the fundraising side). If he is right, and large numbers of those Republicans are going to stand on the sidelines this cycle, November 2008 will be ugly for the GOP.
We better not blow this historic opportunity for realignment.
2 Comments
Interesting conversation
But I'm not surprised. I think the surprisingly weak fundraising by most R candidates is also indicative of this same issue. I'm afraid the easiest way for us to blow this great advantage is to nominate Hillary. Nobody will energize the R base like she does.
rf Sat 21 Jul 4:40 PM
Clinton is the repug choice for Democratic nominee
Witness the huge amount of publicity give to the national polls which she leads. Also note the absence of attacks on her or her positions from any of the pundocracy, just admiration. Whereas any time Obama opens his mouth he is lambasted to a fare thee well. Also his “lack of experience” is expounded upon. Not a word is said about the stunning amount of meaningful law he got passed in Springfield – at first in a Repub dominated legislature. Edwards is also vilified and demeaned constantly.
In 2004 the repug choice was anyonebutDean and it worked with too many democrats saying “but heâ??s unelectable.” I think he was the only one who would have won.
Letâ??s not make the same mistake. Letâ??s not let the Repug choice stand.
Among the personal attacks would be this killer:
Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton, why it’s almost like having Royalty.
QUESTION: Who was leading the national polls in this stage of the 2004 primary race?
ANSWER: Joe Lieberman
Granted Hillary’s lead is more substantial and it’s not like she’ll disappear. Unlike what her campaign says this nomination is far from over.
Her campaign is in panic mode. She inspires NOBODY.
We have a president now who can’t admit to having made a mistake. I don’t want another one.
And the Repugs are not even being discrete:
“I think the defining issue in ’08 is going to be Hillary Clinton.” — Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY), quoted by the Louisville Courier-Journal, when asked if Iraq will be the defining issue in the 2008 campaign….
Posted on August 6, 2007 02:50 PM from the Political Wire
sam
samdobermann Wed 8 Aug 3:34 PM