How Iowans can call in the watchdog

State Auditor Rob Sand speaks at a public town hall in Onawa (Monona County) on May 22, 2023. Photo provided by State Auditor’s office.

Rob Sand is Iowa’s state auditor.

As Iowa’s taxpayer watchdog, I hear from Iowans just about every day with concerns about state and local government. Oftentimes, there are steps my office can take to address those concerns; other times, the next step is as simple as directing folks to the best channel in state government to address their question. Sometimes, it’s easy to also confuse misplaced priorities for misspent money—one requires a change in leadership, and the other requires an audit investigation.

Randy Evans, the executive director of the Iowa Freedom of Information Council, recently raised questions about the state auditor’s responsibility to investigate secret government settlements. Evans wrote in his column that the situation “should have State Auditor Rob Sand knocking on the doors at City Hall” and “asking questions on behalf of the tax-paying people of Davenport.”

What many people don’t know, however, is that the state auditor needs some kind of request to conduct a review at the local level.

How could such an engagement begin? A few ways. Most cities and school districts hire a private CPA firm to perform their annual required audit. For those places, the state auditor can’t perform an additional engagement without a written request from an elected official or employee of the entity, or a petition from at least one hundred eligible electors of the entity.

I’ve said many times that being a taxpayer watchdog isn’t just a job for the state auditor, it is a job for the public too. The people who know their community best are usually the ones who first notice when something is wrong—that’s why we need local elected officials, public servants, and citizens like you to speak up!

Good government only works when citizens are informed and involved in its outcomes. The state auditor’s job is to be a bit of a nitpicker, and I can assure you nobody cheers when the auditor comes knocking. When public officials violate the public trust, though, they must be held accountable. But if it is something local, keep in mind, we need a qualifying request.

That’s the job I was elected to do. I’ll always come down on the side of Iowa’s taxpayers. Iowans should know their taxpayer watchdog barks as often as necessary—whether the perpetrators are Democrats, Republicans, or independents. While that may keep some corrupt public officials up at night, the rest of us sleep soundly.

If you have questions about how an audit works or have reason to suspect public dollars are being misused, please send us an email at info@aos.iowa.gov.


Update and Editor’s note from Laura Belin: Matt Christensen reported for KWQC on January 23,

State Auditor Rob Sand is launching a review of millions of dollars in settlements Davenport recently made with public employees.

The probe has to do with payouts that totaled $2 million: City Administrator Corri Spiegel got $1.6 million and two administrative assistants got the rest. […]

Sand said an elected official in Davenport contacted his office on Dec. 28. That’s a required step for the auditor’s office to launch the investigation. Sand declined to name the official.

About the Author(s)

Rob Sand

  • It's Happening Right in Front of Us

    Good information. Rob is an exceptional public servant.

    Too good, evidently, since the GOP legislature restricted the State Auditor’s authority last year. The traditional role of the auditor in state government oversight had been respected by both parties for decades.

    Here’s Iowa Public’s Radio’s reporting at the time . . . https://www.iowapublicradio.org/state-government-news/2023-06-01/reynolds-signs-law-to-limit-iowa-state-auditors-powers

    There’s just something about oversight, transparency and the rule of law that rubs GOP elected officials the wrong way these days.

  • good to have a more informed populace

    appreciate the info, lord knows we need more not less transparency with this crew running the state, maybe doesn’t help to have an auditor who seems to be running for higher office all the time, perhaps Sand could have more weight as an impartial watchdog if he would make it clear that he won’t seek another political office?

Comments