Obama victory pressures white Europe to confront race

Not to be immodest about the US progressive movement’s efficacy, but we apparently didn’t just win this for America’s sake. That’s some powerful good we worked in the world. 🙂

I realize that this is topically a bit bigger than the state blog beat, but we ought to take ownership of the meta/civilizational changes we helped create too.

Obama’s victory stirs Europe to confront race issue

LONDON – For months before Barack Obama’s election last week, his popularity ratings in Europe soared to levels never matched in America. Now that Obama is headed to the Oval Office as the first African-American president, his victory is prompting Europeans to confront some uncomfortable questions about race within their own countries.

In Britain, the head of the government’s Equality and Human Rights Commission sparked a public debate for saying that a minority politician as “brilliant” as Obama would struggle to “break through the institutional stranglehold on power within the Labor Party.”

“The problem is not the electorate, the problem is the machine,” Trevor Phillips, who is black, told The Times of London. “It’s institutional racism” that extends beyond a single political party, he said.

In France, meanwhile, the wife of President Nicolas Sarkozy has thrown her support behind a new campaign that seeks to wipe out racism and end the white stranglehold on France’s elite political and social institutions. Carla Bruni-Sarkozy, a musician and former model, is backing a manifesto published over the weekend that is subtitled “Oui, nous pouvons!” (French for “Yes, we can!”).

Story here.

About the Author(s)

Stopthehatemongering

  • in a parliamentary system

    I can see how it would be harder for a minority candidate to break through the machine. The machine tends to pick candidates to run in the parliamentary districts (so a grassroots candidate wouldn’t be able to win a primary). The prime minister has to be a member of parliament, so you can’t have someone run for that office as a mayor. The UK doesn’t have the same kind of federalism we have, either, so you don’t get politicians rising to the top by becoming governor of a state.

  • as interesting as this diary is

    I have to ask you to edit it and greatly reduce the material you have copied and pasted verbatim from the McClatchy article.

    Fair use allows blogs to post a link to a news source and an excerpt of a few paragraphs. You have copied and pasted almost the whole piece.

    Feel free to add some thoughts or analysis of your own if you like when you edit the diary.

    • Yes of course...

      I got carried away. It’s not a story that is complex to excerpt. My bust.

      I had no analytical purpose – only to share my visceral sense of having participated in a positive progressive international accomplishment after feeling so ashamed for so long in the Bush years. I can’t think of anything our country has had to offer in terms of cultural or diplomatic  ‘soft power’ during the Bush years that I would call progress or that I would say has advanced civilization.

      I’ll stop huffing ether now and get my feet back on the ground.

  • Mr. desmoinesdem comments

    that Britain has elected a woman prime minister, a Jewish prime minister, several prime ministers from Sctoland or Wales, and may one day elect an atheist of Jewish descent (Milliband).

    Before approximately two generations ago, there was no sizable black population in the UK. But looking at the big picture, they have arguably had more diversity in terms of leadership than the U.S.  

Comments