Right now, I think Barack Obama can make a stronger case with the superdelegates for why they should hand him the nomination instead of giving it to Hillary Clinton. (As is clear, neither candidate can get a majority of delegates without the superdelegates.)
However, every time I inch toward hoping that Obama will win the nomination, he says or does something that alienates me. As I’ve written, Hillary’s advocacy of a gas tax holiday this summer is a major red flag for me. But I learned today that Obama has sent out a direct-mail piece in Kentucky that proclaims, “Barack Obama believes in clean Kentucky coal.” (click the link to see the design)
People, there is no such thing as clean coal. Even if they develop carbon-capture technology in the next decade, there will still be environmental problems related to coal mining and other pollution caused by burning coal. The carbon-capture itself could be problematic, if the carbon is sequestered by turning large quantities of underground water into carbonic acid.
I also have to wonder if Obama really does believe in Kentucky coal. His own energy policy calls for not expanding coal-generated power until sequestration technology is available. For a guy who usually campaigns on being able to tell Americans the truth, even if it isn’t what they want to hear, Obama sure seems to be pandering to Kentucky Democrats. One recent poll in the state shows him more than 30 points behind Clinton. He’s not going to win the May 20 primary in any case, but I’m sure he would prefer not to lose by a 2-1 margin.
If Obama is just pretending to be for “clean Kentucky coal,” that undercuts his claim to be a different kind of politician. And if he really does believe in “clean Kentucky coal,” that’s worse from my perspective.
I didn’t watch Obama’s victory speech in North Carolina tonight, but Populista put up the transcript in this diary.
Populista particularly liked this passage:
So don’t ever forget that this election is not about me, or any candidate. Don’t ever forget that this campaign is about you– about your hopes, about your dreams, about your struggles, about securing your portion of the American Dream.
But I have to say that what is wonderful to many Obama supporters couldn’t be more of a turnoff to me.
That excerpt takes me back to one of the things I disliked about Ronald Reagan in the 80s–the way he used this self-actualizing, empowering rhetoric to get people to project their hopes and dreams onto his candidacy.
I want my candidate to be standing up for the core values of the Democratic Party, which can be defined–not for every American’s hopes and dreams, which could mean anything.
What politician can really claim to stand for everyone’s hopes and dreams? Anyway, some Americans are hoping for policies that are abhorrent to me.
Sometimes Obama seems to be telling me to just believe in myself, but if I need to hear that message I can buy a self-help book or go see a psychotherapist. We need concrete actions from the president, and not just a belief that we can do anything we put our minds to.
I should add that other parts of Obama’s speech tonight, where he got specific about the policies he favors, are much more to my liking.
And this was pure John Edwards:
This is the country that allowed my father-in-law– a city worker at a South Side water filtration plant– to provide for his wife and two children on a single salary. This is a man who was diagnosed at age thirty with multiple sclerosis– who relied on a walker to get himself to work. And yet, every day he went, and he labored, and he sent my wife and her brother to one of the best colleges in the nation. It was a job that didn’t just give him a paycheck, but a sense of dignity and self-worth. It was an America that didn’t just reward wealth, but the work and the workers who created it.
The idea of treating work and wealth fairly, and rewarding both, is exactly the frame we need to use when we talk about changing the tax code.
I also liked the way Obama said, “we can’t afford to give John McCain the chance to serve out George Bush’s third term.”
More like that, please.
3 Comments
I'm still surprised you don't lean toward Obama
Even reluctantly, given Clinton’s DLC ties and party connections that trend toward the conservative side, i.e. Boswell. Comment on that?
Obama to me is a mix of surprisingly refreshing/progressive and typical pol, and sure he panders (he’s running for one of the most powerful positions in the world, after all), but his lead is so overwhelming that I think a Clinton victory now would disenfranchise more voters than Obama’s perceived weaknesses due to how she’d have to secure the nomination.
garonsen Wed 7 May 2:17 AM
well, I lean toward Obama
in the sense that I think having him as the nominee might do less damage to the Democratic coalition than nominating Hillary would. But in part that is because Obama’s campaign has successfully branded the Clintons as racist, which I think is unfair.
In terms of who would be the better president, I feel Hillary is more of a known quantity. Obama may turn out to be a lot better than I expect, or a lot worse. I am not a high-risk, high-reward kind of person.
Also, I had felt that Hillary would have more motivation to push for a progressive agenda, as a way to salvage the Clinton legacy. I fear that Obama will try to pursue a middle road as a gesture to Republicans and the beltway pundits who love him.
Obama is more likely to waste a year or two of his presidency figuring out that the Republicans do not negotiate in good faith and will try to undermine him every step of the way. Hillary already understands this.
I will say, though, that by opportunistically making the gas tax holiday the centerpiece of her campaign lately, Hillary has made it harder for me to believe that she would exceed my expectations as president.
desmoinesdem Wed 7 May 7:34 AM
This coming from someone who
canvassed the streets of Des Moines and nearly all of NW Polk County, including the rural areas, and worked every Edwards campaign event within a 25-mile radius of Des Moines…..I have to say I’ve been noticing the Obama and Clinton campaigns “stealing” all of OUR campaign songs! “This is Our Country,” was blasted through the truck of every single parade we were in. And “The Rising,” that was played after John Edwards had concluded his caucus night speech downtown. Whatever happened to when the Clinton campaign had people vote to choose their campaign theme song?
isucyclones94 Wed 7 May 1:10 PM