A text poll tested these positive messages about Rob Sand

State Auditor Rob Sand hasn’t made his 2026 plans official. But a text poll that was recently in the field is another data point suggesting he will run for governor.

A Bleeding Heartland reader provided screenshots of the survey. Many of the questions test messages about Sand without naming him. Other questions seek to gauge how strongly Iowa voters feel about a series of policies or issues affecting the state.

Based on the wording, I would guess that Sand’s campaign (which closed out 2024 with more than $7.5 million in the bank) commissioned the survey. It’s also possible some other entity supporting Sand’s aspirations invested in this research. It’s not clear how many Iowans received the poll or whether the survey sample reflected the partisan make-up of the statewide electorate, or was tailored for specific groups (such as independent or swing voters).

Assuming Sand runs for governor, he will be heavily favored to win the Democratic nomination. But he may have competition in the June 2026 primary: as I first reported on “KHOI’s Capitol Week,” Julie Stauch filed paperwork on April 21 to create a committee for a Democratic candidate for governor. Stauch has worked on many Iowa campaigns, including Dukakis for president in 1988 and U.S. Representative Leonard Boswell’s 2002 re-election bid. Most recently, she was political director for Pete Buttigieg’s 2020 Iowa caucus campaign, managed Mike Franken’s 2022 campaign for U.S. Senate, and advised Kimberly Sheets, who won a 2023 special election for Warren County auditor.

Back to the text poll about Sand, which appeared on research-opinions.com.

“WHICH ONE WOULD YOU MOST WANT TO HAVE IN YOUR NEXT GOVERNOR?”

The survey began with questions about the respondent’s voting history, plans to vote in 2026, and general political orientation. Respondents were asked whether they approved of a series of political figures, including President Donald Trump, Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird, and Sand.

The next set of questions paired phrases or descriptions and asked, “If you had to choose, which ONE would you MOST want to have in your next governor?”

  • “Works across party lines” or “Works with both parties”
  • “Independent-minded” or “Moderate” or “Middle-of-the-road”
  • “Non-partisan” or “Bipartisan” or “Anti-partisan”

Next, respondents were asked, “Now you are going to read all of the qualities you just read once again. Which TWO qualities would you MOST want to have in your next governor?” I am listing the qualities in the order they appeared in the image shared with me. I don’t know whether my tipster’s answers to previous questions influenced the order, or whether the survey randomized the order.

  • Independent-minded
  • Works across party lines
  • Moderate
  • Non-partisan
  • Middle-of-the-road
  • Bipartisan
  • Anti-partisan
  • Works with both parties

Next, respondents were shown three “descriptions that may sound similar but have important differences. Which ONE would you MOST want to have in your next governor?” The possible answers were “A reformer,” “A public servant, not a politician,” and “An outsider, not an insider.”

The next two questions asked, “Which of the following candidates for governor would you be more likely to vote for if this were all you knew about them?” Respondents were asked to choose between two pairs of statements.

  • “A candidate who cares about people like you” or “A candidate who shares your values”
  • “A candidate who will take Iowa in a new direction” or “A candidate who will continue Kim Reynolds’ legacy”

RATING ROB SAND’S TRAITS OR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

The next set of questions sought to tease out which positive messages about Sand (without using his name) would make voters more likely to support him for governor.

One set of statements described Sand’s actions or accomplishments as state auditor. He routinely cites most of these during his town halls and other public appearances. (For example, watch The Sanborn Pioneer’s YouTube video showing his remarks to a conservative group in O’Brien County in early April.)

For each statement, respondents were asked to check “Much more likely,” “Somewhat more likely,” “No difference,” “Somewhat less likely,” or “Much less likely.”

  • Uncovered a record amount of misspent government money in his first term as Auditor
  • Reformed his government office to allow state employees to live in small towns and rural areas far from Des Moines
  • Started a government efficiency program so effective at saving tax dollars that it was copied in other states
  • Was the only elected official in Iowa to oppose using tax dollars to settle sexual harassment suits against government insiders
  • As a prosecutor, locked up violent criminals, lottery scammers, abusers of the film tax credit program, and public officials of both parties who stole public dollars
  • Promoted his government staff members to senior positions, even after they gave campaign contributions to his opponent

Next, the text poll offered a list of characteristics and asked “if you would be more or less likely to vote for a candidate who does each, or if it would make no difference in your vote for governor.”

  • Will place Democrats, independents, and Republicans in his office leadership
  • Stands up to leaders of both parties to do what’s right for Iowa
  • Criticizes his own party on a regular basis
  • Knows government isn’t about Right versus Left, it’s about right versus wrong

The next questions described things Sand does—again, without using his name. For each, respondents were asked to check one of five options, indicating “if you would be more or less likely to vote for a candidate who does each, or if it would make no difference in your vote for governor.”

  • Goes to church every Sunday
  • Owns several guns
  • Drives a truck
  • Loves to fish and hunt
  • Is married with kids
  • Born and raised in a small town in rural Iowa

MEASURING THE SALIENCE OF POLICIES AND ISSUES

The next part of the text poll asked about 21 issues or policies that could come up in the next campaign. Under each one, respondents could check whether that statement would affect their vote for governor (“Much more likely,” “Somewhat more likely,” “No difference,” “Somewhat less likely,” or “Much less likely”).

I am listing these in the order they appeared on the images shared with me. I don’t know whether the survey randomized the options or presented them in this order for all respondents.

  • Ending the school voucher program that uses tax dollars to fund private school tuition for anyone, even the wealthiest households
  • Ensuring clean drinking water in Iowa communities and replacing lead pipes
  • Restoring the State Auditor’s power to review government records with private and personal information to find waste, fraud, and abuse
  • Reducing rising cancer rates in Iowa
  • Ensuring our law enforcement has the resources they need to keep our communities safe
  • Lowering the cost of prescription drugs
  • Making Iowa government more transparent to voters and taxpayers
  • Holding chemical companies accountable for pesticides that make Iowans sick
  • Instituting term limits for Iowa politicians
  • Protecting and creating jobs
  • Supporting LEGAL immigration, not wide-open borders
  • Protecting our fundamental rights and freedoms
  • Cutting taxes for middle- and working-class families
  • Keeping rural hospitals open and expanding access to affordable health care in underserved areas
  • Ending Iowa’s two-party system and giving voters more choices at the ballot box
  • Standing up to special interests
  • Allowing independent voters to participate in the primary to ensure they have equal voting rights
  • Protecting what’s great about rural Iowa, not just focusing on big cities like Des Moines
  • Opposing using eminent domain for carbon capture pipelines
  • Providing incentives for small businesses to help Iowa’s local economy
  • Lowering costs for Iowans

A few questions about demographics and political leanings closed out the survey. Those responses help campaigns analyze the data collected.


Greg Hauenstein took the top photo of State Auditor Rob Sand at the Iowa Democratic Party’s Liberty and Justice Celebration on July 27, 2024. Find more of Greg’s political photography at the Midwest Visual Press Agency.

About the Author(s)

Laura Belin

  • Not the smartest campaign technique

    Is this the same Julie Stauch that accused Mike Fraken of assault? Not the smartest campaign technique. Sign her up with the Ernst campaign.

    • No title

      You are mixed up. That was the previous campaign manager. Julie Stauch joined the campaign around February 2022 and managed the comeback win in the Democratic primary.

  • Need full transparency on Sand "war chest"

    Good or bad its important to point out that the vast majority of Sand’s fundraising has come from his own family – not grassroots donations.

    • No title

      You are correct, $7 million out of the roughly $8.4 million Sand’s campaign raised during 2024 came from family members. I have reported that on my radio show/podcast (KHOI’s Capitol Week) and will be analyzing his fundraising when he makes his campaign official.

  • maybe he could start a podcast like Gov Newsom

    and talk about hunting and Bible study with Steve King….

  • It looks like the Sand campaign is trying to find out which messages would help him win...

    …and that’s fine with me. As pointed out elsewhere on this website, Iowa has been steadily moving to the right. Any Democratic candidate for governor is going to have a real fight ahead.

  • dirkiniowacity

    I would actually like to see some Iowa Democratic candidates who are hunters and who also support science, funding for wildlife and public land, and requirements for non-toxic shot. That might help gain some votes while breaking a few stereotypes. And I know there are Iowa hunters like that because several are my friends.

    Steve King, on the other hand, hunted pheasants in 2017 on a fancy Iowa private preserve that still allows toxic shot. And of course King’s conservation voting record was horrendous.

  • hi Prairie Fan, Iowa Republicans aren't going to vote for a Dem

    because he hunts, but more to the point of my comment see how many of the above talking points are from the Republican platform and how many are about taking shots (pardon the pun) at his own party. As for the few positive things listed like ending tax dollars for private schools (has he come out supporting such a position?) or limiting pollution who on the other side does he think would support such things? It’s one thing for older folks like Biden to be out of touch with how MAGA these people have gotten but this guy has no good excuse, the truth just seems to be that he can see working with them because he agrees with them on many issues.

    • No title

      Which issues do you think Sand agrees with Republicans about? When I have seen him at his town halls, he is not talking about adopting Republican policies. He is talking about recognizing talent and not getting rid of capable people in his office just because they were a registered Republican.

      Apparently you haven’t seen many Rob Sand speeches because he talks about school vouchers continually, in every public appearance. He emphasizes the lack of accountability and how much money is likely to be wasted.

      Have you looked at the voter registration numbers in Iowa lately? It is impossible to win a statewide election just by maximizing Democratic turnout. A Democrat needs to win the lion’s share of independents and probably also pull some Republican voters. It’s a very tall order and I think the Democrats who get angry when Sand talks about bipartisanship are in denial about the electoral math in Iowa.

  • I have heard Sand speak

    I don’t know Sand personally, but have heard his stump speech several times. He is very personable, funny, smart, engaging, willing to answer questions. From my point of view, all positives. Surely don’t fault a Democrat for being able to talk to Republicans. Iowa should be so lucky.

    Personally, though, I wouldn’t step across the street to hear any of the Republicans whose names are mentioned. Bird ⤵️⤵️ especially. This MAGA shit has worn me to a frazzle.

  • Go Rob

    I don’t agree with all of his positions, but he is a genuinely good and competent guy, and no one farther left of him has gotten close to winning a statewide race in a while. I have friends who are big gun control voters or animal rights voters that are occasionally uncomfortable with things like having deer heads on his parade float or pictures with guns — but those things that make the left uncomfortable are exactly why he can win: those things get rural working class voters to let him in the door, to open their minds to what he says. to dirkiniowacity, sure Iowa has gotten MAGA, but there still are still voters willing to swing — Sand won several counties no other Democratic statewide candidate won. He is, without a doubt, our best chance.

  • hi Laura has Sand taken a position against tax dollars for private schools?

    as to the topic/content of the post here which I was explicitly responding to, talk of money for police (as opposed to what Defunding?. c’mon) , talk of church, guns, term limits, and even in this time of people being disappeared off the streets “open borders”.
    There is a reason people like the good prof Chris Jones replied to this post on his bluesky:
    “Please tell me how I can empty my bank account and spend the next 18 months campaigning for this stud” and “he idea that Sand is merely a vehicle for Nixon Lauridsens unrealized political ambitions is one the Democratic Party ought to be taking seriously”
    and it’s directly related to Sand’s public rhetoric which is of a kind with
    “Criticizes his own party on a regular basis
    Knows government isn’t about Right versus Left, it’s about right versus wrong”
    and especially “Protecting what’s great about rural Iowa, not just focusing on big cities like Des Moines”

Comments