Rick Morain is the former publisher and owner of the Jefferson Herald, for which he writes a regular column.
President-elect Donald Trump’s picks for key positions in government suggest that he envisions his cabinet playing a very different role from past administrations.
Most of Trump’s nominees have relatively little administrative experience or familiarity with the duties and obligations of the departments they will lead, if confirmed. Instead, their chief and uniting characteristic appears to be unshakeable loyalty to Mr. Trump.
That attribute has historically hallmarked ambassadorial appointments, especially if the designated ambassador has made significant financial donations to the president’s campaign. Trump’s cabinet nominees may not be heavy contributors, but their loyalty shows as rock solid, at least in recent years.
Current members of President Joe Biden’s cabinet, like their predecessors, offer advice to the president on issues vital to their particular department. Like most other presidents, Biden chose his cabinet members for their experience and judgment in the work of management. The dossiers of Trump’s nominees, by contrast, are thin in those qualities.
Compare and contrast a few of the key cabinet members in the Biden administration with Trump’s appointees for the same departments:
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
For Biden: Lloyd Austin.
Retired four-star general, commanded combat forces in Iraq and Afghanistan at the one, two, three, and four-star level. Led infantry division from front, traveling 500 miles from Kuwait to Baghdad in a command and control vehicle. Later Commander of CENTCOM, overseeing all 150,000 U.S. troops and their operations in the Middle East and Central and South Asia (20 countries). Routinely advised the President and Secretary of Defense before his nomination.
For Trump: Pete Hegseth.
Political commentator on Fox News since 2014, and previously executive director of Vets for Freedom. Occasionally advised Trump in Trump’s first term. Former National Guard captain in Afghanistan and infantry platoon leader in Iraq. Urged Trump to pardon veterans convicted of war crimes. Opposes women in combat. Says victory for America would be the end of globalism, socialism, secularism, environmentalism, Islamism, genderism, and leftism. Sharply critical of NATO. Opposes a two-state solution in Israel and Palestine and advocates Israeli control of the West Bank. Called on Trump to bomb Iran. Paid settlement to woman who accused him of sexual abuse.
ATTORNEY GENERAL
For Biden: Merrick Garland.
Circuit Judge of the D.C. Court of Appeals from 1997 to 2021. Former law clerk for Supreme Court Justice, former special assistant to the Attorney General, assistant U.S. Attorney for D.C. Nominated by President Obama to the Supreme Court but denied a hearing by the Senate. More federal judicial experience than any other Supreme Court nominee in history. Prosecuted D.C. Mayor Marion Barry for cocaine possession. Supervised Unabomber case, Atlanta Olympics bombing case, and major adviser for Oklahoma City bombing case. Considered a judicial moderate and centrist.
For Trump: Pam Bondi (after first nominee Matt Gaetz withdrew).
Florida Attorney General from 2011 to 2019. Trump defense lawyer in first impeachment trial. Leader of legal arm of America First Policy Institute (a Trump-aligned organization). Endorsed Trump in 2016, saying she had been friends with him for several years. Claimed large-scale voter fraud in Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Wisconsin in 2020.
DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
For Biden: Avril Haines.
Served in Office of Legal Advisor of State Department, first in Treaty Affairs area and then in Political Military Affairs area. Deputy Chief Counsel for Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. Deputy Director of C.I.A. under President Obama. Deputy Counsel to President for national security affairs before appointment to position in C.I.A.
For Trump: Tulsi Gabbard.
Longtime member of Hawaii National Guard, left as Major, then Lieutenant Colonel with Army Reserve. Deployed to Iraq. Former Democratic U.S. Representative from Hawaii and Democratic candidate for President in 2020 primary. Co-sponsored bill to prevent American involvement in wars unless authorized by Congress. Former Vice Chair of Democratic National Committee. Left Democratic Party in 2022 and campaigned for Trump-supported candidates. A paid contributor to Fox News and former fill-in host for Tucker Carlson on that network. Became a Republican on October 22 of this year. Opposes Islamic extremism and aid to Ukraine.
While President-elect Trump will no doubt hold cabinet meetings, they likely will serve different purposes from those of Biden and most other past presidents. A session of the Trump cabinet may resemble a meeting between the head of a business organization and his or her subordinates, where Trump will give instructions and orders for the cabinet to carry out. Less listening, more ordering.
That version differs sharply from standard cabinet procedures, under which the president seeks information and opinions and suggestions from department directors, relying on their expertise to help him formulate policy.
Trump is more likely to hear policy recommendations from his White House staff and from his private sector supporters and acolytes, like those from Fox News and those who created Project 2025 under the auspices of the Heritage Foundation.
How well the cabinet methodology under Trump will succeed is an open question. Will the U.S. be well served, or will cabinet members just be placeholders?
There’s little question that Trump intends major changes in American government, with slavishly loyal subordinates to carry them out.
Editor’s note from Laura Belin: On November 30, Trump announced he will appoint Kash Patel as director of the FBI (even though Christopher Wray has two years remaining on his term). Elaina Plott Calabro profiled Patel in the October 2024 issue of The Atlantic. She reported that Trump’s Attorney General Bill Barr intervened to stop Trump from naming Patel as deputy FBI director, and CIA Director Gina Haspel threatened to resign when Trump considered appointing Patel as deputy director of that agency.
Who was this man, and why did so many top officials fear him?
It wasn’t a question of ideology. He wasn’t a zealot like Stephen Miller, trying to make the bureaucracy yield to his agenda. Rather, Patel appeared singularly focused on pleasing Trump. Even in an administration full of loyalists, Patel was exceptional in his devotion.
Top image: Donald J. Trump with Tulsi Gabbard at a Town Hall Rally in La Crosse, Wisconsin, on August 29, 2024. Photo by LandMMedia, available via Shutterstock.
6 Comments
Below is a GUARDIAN headline from 11/27/24, followed by the lede.
Climate denial a unifying theme of Trump’s cabinet picks, experts say
Loyalists selected for important roles have offered staunch support to fossil fuels and downplayed climate crisis
***
Donald Trump’s cabinet picks have been eclectic and often controversial but a unifying theme is emerging, experts say, with the US president-elect’s nominees offering staunch support to fossil fuels and either downplaying or denying the climate crisis caused by the burning of these fuels.
************
Deep loyalty to Trump and denial of climate change are a frightening combination. Thank you in advance to Iowans who will work in varied ways to defend our biosphere over the next four years.
PrairieFan Sun 1 Dec 1:10 AM
grain of salt
It is interesting how Trump appointees are “loyalists” while the Biden appointees who covered up President Biden’s failing mental faculties are not referred to in the same way.
Karl M Sun 1 Dec 10:17 AM
(When they go low, they go even lower)
This just in: President Biden pardoned his son Hunter Biden on Sunday, wiping away his criminal convictions on tax and gun charges despite saying earlier this year he wouldn’t grant such a reprieve.
Karl M Sun 1 Dec 7:41 PM
Thank to Rick for the contrasts
Rick points out well the problems in store for us.
Hed says Trump values loyalty, but it’s only loyalty to himself.
Karl comments exemplify how Harris and Biden molehills are turned into mountains while Trump’s rap sheet is dismissed as well what do you expect from Trump?
Context for Biden has changed markedly with Trump’s vow to pardon the Jan. 6 criminals.
Time and again Joe Biden has suffered deep family tragedies.
How could he live with himself to have a son in prison while those involved in the the Jan 6 injuries, destruction and damage are honored by Trump.
, injuriesand destruc
Herb Strentz Mon 2 Dec 7:23 AM
Nixon is blushing over the propaganda this admin has spun
“It’s transitory inflation.”
“Afghanistan was a success.”
“The border is secure.”
“Robert Hur lied. Biden is fine.”
“Those videos are cheapfakes.”
“Biden had jetlag.”
“Biden had a cold.”
“Biden isn’t going to be replaced.”
“Biden isn’t going to pardon Hunter.”
ModerateDem Mon 2 Dec 8:16 AM
Molehill, I learned a new word
The Biden family pardon is not just for gun or tax fraud, it is for any Federal offense committed during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 1, 2024. This absolves Hunter from any bribery from Ukrainian companies and State officials. We will never know why we support this remote conflict between two authoritarian countries. What we know are the countless deaths and migrations out of Ukraine, the growing economic and strategic instability in Western Europe. There is a little orphan girl who knows what Hunter Biden did with the “salary” he received for his consulting in Ukraine. Molehills…
Karl M Mon 2 Dec 8:40 AM