Iowa Democrats need to do things differently

Jack Hatch is a retired state senator and was the 2014 Democratic nominee for governor.

As a well-used phrase suggests, “the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over again and expecting different results.”

Our Democratic message was strong, and our attention to our deeply held values of equality, inclusion, and freedom was spot-on. But in Iowa, our organizational structure is off base.  

We lost seats in the Iowa House and Senate and lost two very close races for Congress. Without a strong party organization that represents our coalition, Democrats will continue to lose. This is not a reflection on our party leaders, as much as, it is a reflection of the organization at all levels. We can’t move voters if we don’t engage in a conversation, and we must reach out to them.

Our policy positions of stronger public education, reducing taxes on the middle class, empowering local communities to strengthen their economic base, providing more and better health care to families and protecting our water and soil would result in a healthier Iowa, especially in rural Iowa.

But we are not reaching our voters. And you can’t do it with speeches and press conferences. A rebuild will require a much stronger Iowa Democratic Party to engage citizens in a dialog about the state’s future.

To begin, may I suggest one approach.

Reestablish the “First in the Nation” presidential caucus.

When the political elites at the National Democratic Committee threaten to not recognize our delegates to the national convention, Iowa leaders capitulated, we folded like an aluminum chair after a concert. We must fight like New Hampshire Democrats to keep the “first in the nation” caucuses. This would even be embraced by the Iowa Republican Party who didn’t let their national leadership crush the best organizing and fund-raising mechanism we had.

Reorganize the governing body of the State Central Committee. 

We have way too many voting members. The nineteen constituent caucuses should remain, but not as voting members. The voting members of the central committee should be reduced and come from a smaller number chosen Democrats by the four Congressional district representatives. To make our party more accountable and resilient, we need an “executive committee” to make stronger and quicker administrative decisions.

Better define the role of party chair.

The State Central Committee chair should be a person of experience and stature and not be paid. The chair should choose a professional executive director and staff and pay them well for the exhausting duties of running the party on a day-to-day basis.

Establish a 99-county organizing strategy. 

The highest priority is for the party to organize, train, and provide technical support to each of the 99 county parties. We must dedicate paid staff to organize the Congressional districts and local county parties.

Coordinate on strategy, not just campaigns.

We need to pull-in all the separate, but not equal, outlier organizations to fully develop and execute a two-year plan. This will require an organization that has clear divisions of labor and responsibility. We need a realistic budget, organizational chart depicting areas of responsibility—all to keep this massive voluntary organization headed to obtaining political victories.

Without major reforms, Iowa Democrats will continue to sink into the mirage of thinking we are so “right” on the issues, we can’t lose. But we are losing, and we have to get our head out of the sand and fight back. We have to be smart. We can do it. We fielded great candidates, raised a substantial amount of money, and had a glimpse of strong county party organization. But unfortunately, this has been  sporadic and uncoordinated.

To focus, the current state central committee should hold a series of district summits and get a sense of whether we have the will and the resources to create a “new” Iowa Democratic Party. Creating a stronger party won’t happen by letting the political operatives control the narrative. We need to build a stronger intergenerational party organization, listen to the voters, and execute a strong response to the Republican agenda.

If we don’t act, we risk continued irrelevance.

About the Author(s)

Jack Hatch

  • Lot to do

    We need to “listen to the voters”. Yes. Nice moustache btw.

  • excellent article

    Jack is a longtime veteran of Iowa politics and a pragmatist; our paths have crossed several times. He brings some much-needed common sense to the discussion.

  • Maybe Hatch might come back to lead?

    I agree 100%. It takes no wizard to see the 2016 caucuses were a turning point. Bernie spoke to a new crop of caucus attendees. Our caucus was overwhelmed by people needing to both register to vote and register their attendance.in separate lines. Newbies came expecting to vote and go home, not faceoff in preference groups and be (haphazardly) counted and delegates awarded, like in days when caucuses were small gatherings of known Democrats. It’s completely explicable that these folks complained to Bernie who didn’t hold back.

    Even though not a D, he demanded and got changes for 2020. To remain faithful to the caucus concept yet keep the accurate count Bernie wanted, the Party came up with an app for cellphones. In our north Ankeny caucus the changes worked fine and our chair had the app down Paul, and he used it to record each step and mostly people left satisfied with the process.

    Out in the hinterlands, caucus chairs must not have gotten the memo. The app was eith ignored or never loaded on phones or no phones or service. Anyway, they resorted to phone lines, which were swamped and results couldn’t get through to caucus central. We were watching Channel 13 and their crew was ready to give us the scoop, which didn’t get finally tabulated until days later. Iowa got s black eye, and with Biden wanting to be renominated, South Carolina got the nod. Iowa had some sort of paper ballot caucus. Far from the party-building enthusiasm of yesteryear.

    Jack is 100% right. The only things standing in the way are the needs for candidates, leaders, staffing, resources, and enthusiasm that comes with organizing.

    BTW. In two years, Reynolds or some other Republican will be on the ballot for governor. And the feckless Ernst for U.S. Senator, plus 4 Congressional seats, 100 state Representatives, and at leastb25 state senators. Hatch’s recommendations should be in the hand of every Iowan who professes democracy as a Democrat.

Comments