Iowa’s extreme weather continues to ramp up

Rick Morain is the former publisher and owner of the Jefferson Herald, for which he writes a regular column.

Fifteen inches of rain in northwest Iowa. Unbelievable. We don’t have drenchers like that in this state. But we did.

Most of us remember well the eight, nine, or ten inches (depending on whom you talk to) that fell on Greene County back in 1993, which flowed down the mighty Raccoon River to devastate Des Moines. Last week’s total near the state’s northwest corner puts that event to shame. Some rivers reached record flood levels, causing damage never seen before in towns large and small. The Iowa Great Lakes and its surrounding communities shared in that damage.

It could just as easily have happened last week in and around Greene County instead. The vagaries of weather fronts, wind direction, etc., steered it to northwest Iowa, southeast South Dakota, and southwest Minnesota. Pictures of the flooding are jaw-dropping. Where the next deluge occurs is anyone’s guess. But it won’t be long until another one strikes somewhere in Iowa.

This year is shaping up to be full of more weather catastrophes in the United States than in any other year that most people can remember. Scorching heat, long-term drought, tornadoes, hurricanes, incredible rainstorms, storm-induced wildfires—seems as if not a week goes by without some devastating weather event somewhere on American soil. So-called “500-year” floods seem to happen every few years nowadays.

People step up to help following weather emergencies. The aftermath of last month’s storm in Greenfield—among the most powerful tornadoes recorded in 25 years—is a typical example. Private citizens, non-profit groups, and the state and federal government converged on Greenfield, and other damaged locations in the state, starting shortly after the wind stopped blowing. They’re still there, doing what they can, and financial assistance follows right behind.

In some places, people are preparing for the next disaster. Government agencies harden dams, dikes, and levees, improve warning systems, and stockpile emergency supplies.

All those steps help. But they don’t solve the problem. Americans have yet to take climate change seriously enough to do much about it. Most farms focus on moving excess water off the land as quickly as possible, thereby contributing to river flooding downstream.

Insurance companies are raising premiums and/or reducing coverage, in order to keep up with claims losses from the continuing flow of weather catastrophes. Those responses hit all Iowans in their pocketbooks, and any future respite from that trend is a crapshoot.

Our inability to prevent such emergencies can be frustrating. We can be warned about severe weather, take steps to protect ourselves, and do what we can for our families, neighbors, and friends.

But little can be done to stop a flood, or a tornado, or a heavy downpour, or a long-term drought. Reducing the frequency of those weather events would require addressing climate change—there’s no longer any doubt about that. And even if Iowans “got religion” about climate change, it would take similar conversion experiences of people around the nation and around the world to make a serious difference.

Not much sign of that on the horizon.


Top photo of Hawarden was among the images Governor Kim Reynolds’ office released on June 22 following her tour of flooded areas in northwest Iowa.

Editor’s note from Laura Belin: Iowans needing assistance following extreme weather events, or those who want to donate to reputable organizations helping others in need, can find resources at the state of Iowa’s Disaster Recovery website.

About the Author(s)

Rick Morain

  • This is a headline I've come across...

    in various forms, at various times, in a number of sources. “The GOP is the world’s only major climate-denialist party.”

    I’m not claiming that the rest of the world is doing a fabulous job of addressing climate change. The U.S., however, seems to have a special political problem.

  • Climate destabilization

    is perhaps a more apt term, suggests Greta Thunberg. I agree.

    I’d go one further: Warming induced climate destabilization.

    Maybe that’s too long of a sound bite, but it’s the shortest phrase I can think of that at least begins to convey what “climate change” utterly fails to convey.

    I don’t know why it seems, to me at least, that the wind tends to blow more often and stronger and longer than four, five, six decades back. I could be mistaken.

    But I believe it does. And I believe it’s likely due to same reason the water in a pot on the stove begins to move around faster as it’s temperature goes up.

    The chart below allows a mind to grasp the scale of what we’ve done to the planet’s temperature in a short amount of time, compared to the past twenty-two thousand years:

    https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/1732:_Earth_Temperature_Timeline

    (Maybe I’ve linked that here before; can’t remember.)

  • It is also worth noting...

    …that the tallgrass prairie ecosystem that once covered eighty-five percent of Iowa was a gigantic sponge. Original-prairie soils can hold impressive amounts of water. One experiment showed an original prairie completely absorbing a seven-inch rain event, no problem.

    The same farm conservation measures that can improve Iowa’s bad water quality can also reduce flooding. It’s time for Congress to pass a new Farm Bill that requires farms to incorporate water-friendly conservation in order to receive taxpayer subsidies, especially subsidized crop insurance.

  • Yup

    Agree, PrairieFan.

    I wanted to cry awhile back after my “We’re doing it to ourselves,” acknowledging neighbor employed a guy awhile back to go in and spray poison on a native friend to our state bird and many butterflies as it was not yet in bloom, but beginning to tower over the rest of the unmanaged plot of ground nearby us, owned by neither of us.

    Same place I’ve been collecting some good native seeds past few years, and manually digging out invasive multi-flora rose and honeysuckle. (I haven’t asked permission. I suspect he has not, either.)

    At least a guy can throw a rock or an unopened full beer can at a plant destroying varmint like a groundhog. (Bad tasting beer; no loss.) Can’t do that with neighbor. I’ve explained it to him before. Not gonna try again. Effective as talking to a groundhog. Same guy when we toured a native restoration area at a park a few years back grumbled in disgust about how they were “letting the place go to weeds.”

    One pleasant aspect this year has been a return of more desirable insects (excepting monarchs; where are they?) after so many dry years — and yet very, very few Japanese Beetle munchers.

    Lightning bugs are very much back. Here anyway. Then I take a walk up the street. Nuthin’. OK, not completely nothing. But next to nothing. I have a theory on that, too. Years and years of poison application to lawns is not helpful, even if not targeting lightning bugs or any insects specifically. I dunno. I could be wrong.

  • Also....

    Understandably the people tragedy of the flooding takes precedence, but I’ve been wondering how many factory farm livestock facilities have been breached now, adding to our polluted waters problem.

    My previous personal rant got overtaken by this thought.

  • Fly__Fly__Fly__Away

    Sympathies!! And thank you for trying!! You and I could share many stories, I’ll bet. And thank you also for that great climate-change link, which I have been sharing.

  • PrairieFan

    Thanks for the sympathy note. Yeah, that cartoon chart stuns at the end, doesn’t it?

Comments