Herb Strentz reflects on Republican Jake Chapman’s claim that his Democratic opponent Sarah Trone Garriott is a “radical activist.”
Fear-mongering and baseless campaign attacks against candidates for public office are not restricted to Iowans who dare to seek election while being Black—as is the case for Deidre DeJear, Iowa’s Democratic candidate for governor.
Yes, commentators from Bleeding Heartland to the Des Moines Register’s editors have rightly condemned Governor Kim Reynolds’ ads against DeJear as race-baiting.
And yes, “politics ain’t beanbag.” It’s not for the thin-skinned.
That “beanbag” contrast is as true today as it was in 1895, when Finley Peter Dunne quoted his fictional character, Mr. Dooley, pontificating about rough-house Chicago politics.
In fact politics may be even less “beanbag” today, when federal laws prohibit broadcast stations from editing or refusing to run campaign ads even if the ads are clearly false, misleading, or maybe obscene. (Under the First Amendment, newspapers largely can do what they want with campaign ads; licensed broadcast stations cannot.)
So candidates are free to counter campaign broadcast ad lies by an opponent with lies of their own. Voters have to sort it out and even write about one ad or another, as is the case with this post and the responses to Reynolds’ ad.
One hopes that having sorted it out, we will cast informed ballots on November 8, regardless of the “equal-opportunity” smears and deception in so much of the election chaos.
So, here is a take on the race between Republican Jake Chapman, the Iowa Senate president, and Democratic State Senator Sarah Trone Garriott, who both wound up in the newly fashioned Iowa Senate district 14.
In the “politics ain’t beanbag” way of things, Chapman gained some state and perhaps national notoriety when he opened the 2022 session of the Iowa legislature with accusations that public school teachers were corrupting Iowa youth. Chapman warned, “One doesn’t have to look far to see the sinister agenda occurring right before our eyes. The attack on our children is no longer hidden.”
To deal with the supposed harm caused by teachers, Chapman introduced Senate File 2198, which, among other things, would have sent teachers to jail for exposing students to books he considered obscene.
The measure, widely criticized, got out of the Senate Judiciary Committee but was never brought to a vote on the Iowa Senate floor. It remains, however, as evidence of Chapman’s beliefs leading to his ad accusations that Trone Garriott is a “radical activist” and likely worse.
For her part, the Democrat certainly is an activist and perhaps “radical” in some eyes—but not in the Chapman context.
For disclosure, as a member of Faith Lutheran Church in Clive, I became acquainted with Trone Garriott when she served as our associate pastor before joining the Des Moines Area Religious Council in 2017. Her DMARC title is coordinator of interfaith engagement, working with youth and adults of various faiths, supporting DMARC efforts in food pantries and addressing other community needs.
If Chapman wanted to really nail down Trone Garriott as a radical activist, maybe he could have quoted from her “rap sheet.” It’s right there in Matthew 25: 35-36:
35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.
The rap sheet helps provide perspective for her service on the Senate committees on Education, Human Resources, Health and Human Services Appropriations, and Natural Resources and Environment.
And it pretty much covers all the aspects of her activism.
Fresh out of college, she worked with victims of domestic violence in New Mexico in an AmeriCorps VISTA (Volunteers in Service to America) program. She then entered the ministry, and was a hospital chaplain and a Lutheran pastor at a rural church in Virginia and at Faith Lutheran. At Faith she organized members of the congregation to visit inmates at the womens prison in Mitchellville. Her work in DMARC is what Matthew 25 is about.
Dealing with the Chapman-Trone Garriott race in terms of national concerns may be but a stitch or two in the turmoil of a national crazy quilt of concerns about our congress, president, judiciary, governors and on down the list.
Those concerns have led to the concept of “democracy fatigue.”
One definition of such fatigue is “Political passivity and disgruntlement that stems from the exhaustion of seeing endless politicking, but never seeing change that makes lives better.”
The quest for making lives better continues November 8. One stitch at a time, including in Senate district 14.
We’ve done it right at times — stuck as we are in Winston Churchill’s assessment 75 years ago:
Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.…
Herb Strentz was dean of the Drake School of Journalism from 1975 to 1988 and professor there until retirement in 2004. He was executive secretary of the Iowa Freedom of Information Council from its founding in 1976 to 2000.
Top photos of Jake Chapman and Sarah Trone Garriott cropped from pictures published on their campaign Facebook pages.
4 Comments
And. . . ?
While I agree with Dean Strentz’s support of Senator Trone Garriott, I challenge the journalism professor to teach all of us about how to reach the average Iowan with the proper information about the candidates.
I ask because, and I think Dean Strentz will agree, so-called, “journalists,” aren’t getting the job of communication done — not only about candidates, but about much of anything. So-called, “journalism,” isn’t about reporting on issues. Rather, what passes for journalism is like a cheap snap-shot. It tells us what happened, with no context, no follow-up, no sourcing and, often, it’s just a re-hashing of someone else’s “reporting,” with a by-line from the city where the event happened, which isn’t the city from which the “reporter” is reporting.”
It is easy for Bleeding Heartland subscribers to know what an unoriginal opportunist and scripted provocateur Jake Chapman is. After all, we have read about what he has done, professionally and personally, and what legislation he has proposed (and sometimes, we are privy to who actually wrote it) and we have seen videos of his advocacy from the floor of the legislature.
And, of course, we know about Senator Trone Garriott from pieces in this blog, but also from her door-knocking and her numerous public events (and videos of her advocacy on the Senate floor).
Senator Trone Garriott is out and about, and has been since the turn of the year, answering questions and showing up.
Unlike Mr. Chapman.
But most folks are not voracious consumers of this stuff; many or most don’t have the leisure time for it.
So, these adverts are all they have to go by.
Since the vocation about which Professor Strentz taught for 29 years is no longer much of a conduit for meaningful information, what solution does he propose to counter untruthful advertisements and the First Amendment and, what’s the likelihood of the success of the proposal?
And while I’m asking, what good does teaching journalism do anymore? Has it been reduced to that of a Sunday sermon, spewing aspirations that have little to no application in the real world?
Bill from White Plains Fri 7 Oct 3:07 PM
In response
The comments from Bill, regarding changes in much of the news coverage of these days, may understate my concerns about where we are and where we are going.
But many of the problems we’re having today, we also had when we had far better coverage of political issues. But not to the degree they threaten our system of government as they do today.
The comments reflect, in a way, the “democracy fatigue” mentioned in the post.
Martin Luther King Jr. said “the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”
I heard a different take on that recently, that the arc of justice bends toward those who tug the hardest.
Too often people are satisfied with having a better understanding of what is going on as opposed to doing something about it.
I was 29-30 years in journalism ed at Drake and six years elsewhere. Students and the classroom were always a source of hope and optimism and I think they remain so today.
There is good work out there and good coverage can be found — but increasingly people not only cling to misinformation but refuse to hear, read or see otherwise.
And much of the corporate news side fears driving such people away from advertisers who pay the bills.
On the plus side we have more grassroots involvement.
As for the other comment on the Register endorsement policy. The Register a few years ago used to offer as many as 15 editorials a week and in the days of the old R&T the papers combined might offer 150 or more a month! N ow we’re down to one editorial a week in the Sunday paper and far fewer letters to the editor.
Gannett in general is pushing that approach, which exacerbates the problems we’re having in people seeking reinforcement of misguided opinions.
One hopes that the grassroots effort today will tug hard enough so we have some measure of sanity resulting from the Nov 8 election.
Herb Strentz Sat 8 Oct 12:46 PM
Diagnosis
Diagnosing me as having “democracy fatigue” dodges the questions I ask. And my questions are sincere
Though the post about which we comment is not a model of clarity, it does begin with a section bemoaning the First Amendment protections of untruthful advertising in media aside from newspapers, all of which produce some semblance of what used to be “journalism.”
The professor blames the people I described — those without the luxury of time to invest themselves in news and politics — for “cling[ing] to misinformation” and “refus[ing] to hear, read or see otherwise.”
Putting aside the arrogance of this characterization of people who don’t have leisure time, recall that I asked the professor what can be done about getting accurate information to them.
When he’s done belittling people who might appreciate accurate information if it was presented to them, all Professor Strentz has to say is that his students over three decades gave him “hope,” that there is “good work out there,” and that somewhere “out there” “good coverage can be found.”
None of this answers that question, let alone my question about whether “journalism” as a curriculum ever plays out in the real world, or, instead, is just a set of principles confined to the classroom.
For that, the Professor blames Gannett, a publishing concern, for “exacerbat[ing] the problems we’re having in people seeking reinforcement of misguided opinions.”
I expected real answers from a man who says he taught this stuff for 30 years.
Instead, I got more observations — observations I don’t appreciate because I’m already well aware of them.
Since the Professor of Journalism seems to have a need to quote others in order to seem erudite, here is something from the person awarded 2016 Nobel Prize for literature, which directly targets “journalists” of Mr. Strentz’s ilk:
“Ah, you’ve been with the professors and they’ve all liked your looks
With great lawyers you have discussed lepers and crooks
You’ve been through all of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s books
You’re very well-read, it’s well-known
But something is happening here and you don’t know what it is
Do you, Mr. Jones?”
Bill from White Plains Sat 8 Oct 3:16 PM
Register
The Register may have commented on the racist Reynolds ads, but they don’t have the guts to endorse in the race. So screw them.
Rod Sullivan Sat 8 Oct 9:48 AM