Don't Ask, Don't Tell repeal derails Defense Authorization Act in Senate

Back when George W. Bush was president, Republicans assailed any vote against any military funding bill as not supporting our troops on the battlefield. But the Republican caucus was united yesterday as the Senate voted 56-43 to block debate on this year’s Defense Authorization Act. The bill included a compromise likely to lead to lifting the ban on gays openly serving in the military. Even Republican Susan Collins of Maine, who says she’s for repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, stuck with her caucus over complaints about Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s restrictions on amendments during debate over the bill. One amendment Reid had planned to allow would have added the DREAM Act to the defense authorization bill. The DREAM Act “would allow undocumented students brought to America as children to earn a path to citizenship through completion of higher education or military service.”

Only two Democrats sided with Republicans to block debate on this bill: Blanche Lincoln and Mark Pryor of Arkansas. (Reid switched his vote to “no” at the last minute for procedural reasons, so he would be able to bring it up again later this year.) Lincoln’s excuse was the same as Collins’: she claimed to be for the DREAM Act and the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell compromise, but was angered by limits on amendments during the debate. Senate procedure is more important to these people than civil rights. At least Lincoln’s going to lose her re-election campaign anyway.

Although President Barack Obama has said he’s for repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, there’s no indication he or other White House officials lifted a finger to influence yesterday’s vote in the Senate. Nor did the president accuse those who blocked debate of undercutting soldiers at war, the way George Bush surely would have done in similar circumstances.

In Iowa, critics of Senator Chuck Grassley reacted quickly to his vote blocking debate on the defense bill. A statement from One Iowa accused him of compromising military readiness:

“Senator Grassley should stop playing politics with our national security,” said One Iowa Executive Director Carolyn Jenison. “Gay and lesbian servicemembers provide additional expertise and skills the military needs. Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell compromises the integrity of our armed sources and puts gay servicemembers at risk.”

Although Democratic Senate candidate Roxanne Conlin has long advocated civil equality for gays and lesbians, her campaign strangely sidestepped the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell angle in its statement yesterday:

“This is just one more inexcusable vote from Iowa’s senior Senator,” said Paulee Lipsman, spokesperson for the United States Senate campaign of Roxanne Conlin.  “His action denies a pay raise for the very men and women who are risking their lives for their country in the Middle East.  These families should not have to be on food stamps while a member of their family is off fighting in Afghanistan. Grassley’s vote denies better health care for those who are wounded.  It denies better equipment for those in combat.”

“Over the past two years, Senator Grassley has followed the advice of Senator Jim DeMint that Republicans block everything proposed by the Obama administration.  This partisanship is why Washington is broken.”

Key provisions of the bill include:

·         Authorize an across the board 1.4% pay raise for the military.

·         Improve the quality of life of the men and women of the all-volunteer force (active duty, National Guard and Reserves) and their families through fair pay, policies and benefits, including first rate health care, and address the needs of the wounded, ill, and injured service members and their families.

·         Provide our servicemen and women with the resources, training, technology, equipment (especially force protection) and authorities they need to succeed in combat and stability operations.

·         Enhance the capability of the Armed Forces to conduct counterinsurgency operations and apply the lessons of Iraq to Afghanistan, as appropriate.

I don’t think Grassley was proud of this vote. His Senate office put out several press releases yesterday, but nothing on the Defense Authorization Act.

Share any relevant thoughts in this thread.

UPDATE: During her September 22 meeting with the Sioux City Journal editorial board, Conlin called for Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell to be overturned:

Closeted gays ably serve in the military today, she said, but cited that 13,000 have left service at a time when the military needs positions filled by well-prepared Americans.

“We are granting waivers to convicted felons and we are throwing out people, experienced West Point graduates. It makes no sense,” Conlin said.

She continued: “It is not as though, right now, gay people are not serving. They are, they’re there, they’re fighting for us, they are dying for us. The only question is – can they do it without living a lie? The answer to that, in the United States of America, has to be ‘yes.’ “

About the Author(s)

desmoinesdem

  • Disappointing

    Ben Nelson even voted for this with the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell repeal as a part of it, Nelson would be more likely to face more political heat than many of the Republicans who voted not to move forward.  

    I would love to have a conversation with John McCain for example with no cameras in sight, he would admit that this is just a political ploy to appease the religious right.  

  • I have been working for years...

    To get Congress to stop military funding, as lack of funding by Congress is what truly ended the war in Vietnam.

    I have lobbied with my body and soul innumerable times, both locally and in D.C. to get Congress to block passage of the annual defense authorization act, for seven consecutive years.

    I am very conflicted by DADT, since I would counsel anyone not to join the military as a matter of principle, but I do support full inclusion of all persons in all aspects of society, regardless. However…

    I’ll. be. damned.  

    • don't get too excited

      They’re not ready to defund the military–this bill will sail through as soon as they strip DADT repeal from it.

    • I am probably stepping into grass that I shouldn't even wander into but

      Elton, what else do you expect many of these kids with no job or life skills to do with their lives if they cannot join the military?  Many of these kids don’t want to do anything else and often consider some other job to be beneath them.  Does the anarchist in you say just let the chips fall where they may?  

      I can understand cutting the military budget probably by about seventy percent, but to completely defund it would create massive unemployment, but I’m sure I will regret asking this question (:  

      • That's a VERY good question...

        ModIADem, at 16 years of age I found myself out of a job because they had to let me go.  The reason they let me go is because they didn’t realize I wasn’t 18 when they hired me and their insurance wouldn’t cover me working in an iron foundry. Desperate to earn my way in the world, I left for boot camp two weeks after my 17th birthday.

        That is not an experience I would wish on anyone.

        I would gladly pay more tax dollars from my pocket to help create opportunities for these young people.  And I do try and work with young people to create alternatives to military service at every opportunity that presents itself.  It would be a challenge, but I would definitely step up and do what I could.  

        There are many alternatives to military service that could help improve physical infrastructure while educating our youth and giving them just the sort of life skills you feel they are lacking.  It would cost a lot of money to be sure, but when 50 per cent of our federal tax dollars go to support the military budget, I see direct service to helping improve communities as a much better investment.  

        Ok, so was that response too painful to read?  🙂

        @DMD, ya, I know, it’s just been a long painful decade, looking for sunshine wherever I can find it… We’re thinking of having a press conference in front of the DM Federal Building next week to thank Grassley for blocking the Defense Authorization Act of 2011.  

        • Excellent Response

          The very reason that you do not file your taxes however is probably the exact reason why many conservatives in this country still file theirs. so its a real catch-22 and frankly I wanna shake both sides and say “what the hell?”

          Those defense contractors are providing some of the only manufacturing we have left, and if we tackle the carbon crisis at the level many environmentalists want us to and we may need to, that only grants more power to the defense contractors.

          Now before we hear someone scream green jobs, green jobs.  Green jobs are great, but we can only get so much within the political realities in Congress.  We are going to have more Republicans in Congress in 2011, not less.  There are also many Democrats who have to represent very conservative people as well.  

          • As far as filing taxes goes?

            What makes you think I don’t PAY them?  Not paying them is not an option.  Filing is a choice.  I don’t think you ever got that part.  I pay in to FICA, Social Security, etc…

            When I said I would gladly pay more income tax, I meant by percentage.

            Plenty of taxes have been removed from my paychecks over the years, trust me.  I just choose not to file.  All those checks and special breaks you got over the years?  Not me, I simply paid my taxes, and expected very little from the government in return.

            $1500 earned income tax credit when I was a single parent with sole custody of my child?  Nope.  $300 from George Junior?  Nope. Don’t blame me for running down the fiscal surplus.  Did you cash your $300 surplus check?  I’m guessing you did. The government takes it’s tribute, come what may, but I try to engage as little as possible.  

            Ok, onto the jobs question.  I was told by the director of the Princeton Plasma Fusion Lab that we need a “moonshot” to make that technology a reality.  But 50 per cent of tax dollars go into the military budget.  So the largest source of “green” energy and carbon reduction we could possibly hope for is still not being seriously explored and developed.  

            We also have bridges that have collapsed, and highways in need of serious attention.  It takes 8-10 hours on average to ride Amtrak from Chicago to Osceola due to track deterioration.  It only took 12 hours to go from Chicago to Denver on the same route in 1936.  

            Supporting our current military budget has it’s price. And the cost is increasing deterioration of domestic infrastructure.  Millions of good, decent jobs just waiting if we could fund them instead of the military.

  • I'm 23

    I’ve only been working for four years, the only break I get is the computer I bought one of those years, just because I’m not a hard line socialist doesn’t mean I get tax breaks.  You crack me up bro.  

    You always act like somebody either must be rich or else they would embrace hard line socialist thinking.  Maybe its our own fault if we don’t make a lot of money one year to the next in some situations?  Its mine if I have a bad year.    

    I hope you’re right on the green technology issue and I bet we largely agree on a fair amount of the infrastructure questions.

Comments