Not Again: The Fringe Right Takes Aim At Climate Change Before Seeing the Bill

Today we learn that the far-right have launched a new operation to attack a yet-to-be- released climate change bill.  According to Roll Call:  

The effort, which Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence (Ind.) is spearheading, is designed to coincide with Senate introduction of a climate change proposal next week and the upcoming annual summer spike in gas prices that inevitably results in a message war on Capitol Hill over which party is to blame for higher prices at the pump.

Wow.  Really?  An entire destructive operation dubbed “American Energy Solutions Group” to take down a bill no one has seen?  What kind of “solution” is that?    

On April 26, a bipartisan group of forward-leaning Senators – John Kerry, D-Mass., Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Joe Lieberman, I-Ct., – will roll out comprehensive clean energy and climate legislation. The bill is still under wraps, but done right, a climate and energy bill can put Americans back to work, reduce our dependence on foreign oil and create a healthier future for us all.  The three Senators deserve enormous credit for their work to craft a bill, but instead the far right is trying to kill their work before it even sees the light of day.

We need a bill that will create two million good-paying jobs for American workers, and position American businesses for decades of success in the growing global clean energy marketplace. A successful bill would cut our oil imports in half and strike a blow against climate change, the most pressing environmental challenge of our time.  We will see if this bill gets there on Monday.  Those gearing up to bring it down should read it along with the rest of us.

I went to elementary school in Kentucky.  Like children from across the country, I learned a lot about the history there.  One thing that has stuck with me is their state motto, “United We Stand, Divided We Fall.”  

The state of American politics seems to be in a bit of a free fall and this latest move by extremests – or as the kids these days like to say “haters” – before even seeing a bill just underscores what a ridiculous free fall we are in. When will political points lose out to meaningful policy that addresses a real need?

Even if you don’t believe in climate change, there are a million reasons to put our country on a clean energy path.  

You would think that a crowd called the “American Energy Solutions Group” would get that.  The only “solution” they seem to be looking for is gridlock.  I hope that they realize the damage that their selfish and short-sighted propaganda is doing to our country.  

United we stand, divided we fall.  

Heather Taylor-Miesle is the director of the NRDC Action Fund. Become a fan on Facebook or Twitter.

About the Author(s)

Heather TaylorMiesle NRDC Action Fund

  • Lindsey Graham

    I find it interesting that Graham is working together with Lieberman and Kerry on this climate bill,  and coincidentally that so and so Republican tries to “out” Graham, saying he is a homosexual.  I am wondering if that’s the very reason the guy tried to say Graham is in the closet over his alternative lifestyle.  I wondered when he said it if there was a reason we didn’;t know about, why he was outed.

    I could care less what someone does in the privacy of their own home.  but I am sure Graham, whether he is a homosexual or not, does not want this to come out this way.  I find that someone is actually trying to do something worthwhile in a bipartisan way and the Conservatives try to ruin everyone’s reputation.  

  • if the NRDC supports this bill

    I will never renew my membership.

    Enough details have leaked about the bill to conclude that it is not the kind of clean energy bill we need. Three major oil companies are backing the bill, and why shouldn’t they?

       *  The bill would remove the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to regulate carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act, and the states’ authority to set tougher emissions standards than the federal government.

       * There will be no fee-or “gas tax”-on transportation fuels. Instead, oil companies would also be required to obtain pollution permits but will not trade them on the market like other polluters. How this would work is not yet clear.

       * Agriculture would be entirely exempt from the cap on carbon emissions.

       * Manufacturers would not be included under a cap on greenhouse gases until 2016.

       * The bill would provide government-backed loan guarantees for the construction of 12 new nuclear power plants.

       * It will contain at least $10 billion to develop technologies to capture and store emissions from coal-fired power plants.

       * There will be new financial incentives for natural gas.

       * The bill would place an upper and lower limit on the price of pollution permits, known as a hard price collar. Businesses like this idea because it ensures a stable price on carbon. Environmental advocates don’t like the idea because if the ceiling is set too low, industry will have no financial incentive to move to cleaner forms of energy.

       * The energy bill passed by the Energy and Natural Resources Committee last year will be adopted in full. This measure has sparked concerns among environmentalists for its handouts to nuclear and fossil fuel interests.

    Time for the NRDC to stop playing Washington games and start speaking the truth about this bill. These compromises are not worth whatever “clean energy” provisions they will trot out. Better to pass nothing.

  • Lemons or Lemonaid?

    The “just say no” R’s have stepped in it again, if the D’s can seize the opportunity.  Energy policy can be the greatest jobs creation platform the Nation has ever seen, or it can be just another handout of taxpayer money to a handful of Mega Corporations.  The jury is out but I’m not optimistic given the trio.  Electric generation and clean fuel production can be supported/incented in order to not only get production but supported in order to advance issues of sustainability, things such as, jobs, rural economic development, air,water and soil protection and energy security.  With no more public “sunshine” on the issue that what I have seen, the Lieberman/Graham/Kerry effort is suspect until seen.  

    What this issue does in spades is to show the critical need and opportunity for Iowa political leaders to capture this issue for Iowa.  So far too few pols have looked at any other option than to give give give to Iowa Big Coal and Big Oil.  Perhaps the R’s will see the opportunity first.  Stranger things have happened.

Comments